You are currently browsing the blog archives for January 2013.


WRITING WEDNESDAY: A RIFT AMONG WRITERS!

January 30th, 2013

Hey, everyone, it’s Writing Wednesday again! This week won’t be talking about writing advice. Instead, I want to focus on something I’ve heard a lot about lately. During my residency at SHU, the topic of literary vs. genre fiction came up pretty often. However, the focus wasn’t on what people enjoyed reading. The focus was on how genre writers have been treated in various academic settings. Other students brought up this issue everyday while I was there and I quickly realized that my own experience didn’t match the majority.

If you’re taking part in Seton Hill’s MFA program, you probably came from a school where you received (at least) an undergraduate degree. If you’re like me, your undergraduate experience was probably where you experienced some of your first writing workshops. Now, I know this isn’t true for all SHU students but that was my experience. I enrolled in seventeen writing workshops during my undergraduate career. My background covers fiction, poetry, non-fiction, and screenplay writing, pretty much in that order. When you go to graduate school, you bring your own set of experiences. This doesn’t just mean how many workshops you’ve taken or what your degree is in, but also how your work has been received in the past.

My undergraduate school, Stetson University, was a great place to write. Their creative writing program was relatively small but I never felt boxed in because the professors were incredibly open-minded about writing. I felt encouraged to write literary fiction as well as genre fiction. Their goal focused on writing well, not writing to a specific audience.

Various students shared their experiences with me and I was shocked by what I heard. Apparently, a lot of undergraduate professors won’t even accept genre work. They won’t teach it, they won’t accept it, and they try to stamp it out wherever it appears. Maybe you’ve had a similar experience. There’s a pretty big problem with this approach. I’m in a program full of genre writers. I’m in a program with people who have been published and people who will be published in the future. Well, genre writers who feel slighted by their former literary professors may carry those feeling over to literary writers in general. These feelings (on both sides) create an unnecessary rift in the writing community.

My own experience was very different. I wrote what I wanted to, when I wanted to, and everything was received equally. I’m still friends with literary writers and I have nothing bad to say about my undergraduate professors or their creative writing department. A woman in one of my undergraduate workshops went on to get a three book deal shortly after graduation. She wrote, and still writes, genre fiction. Other students in the class went on to publish literary short stories. They had the same peers, the same professors, and the same encouragement from people in the department.

Let’s take a quick look at Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. In short, this is a story about a man and his child trying to survive in a post-apocalyptic setting. Now, I love The Road and spent quite a bit of time studying it for a research paper. During my research I came across various critics arguing about whether or not The Road is genre fiction. Well, it’s post-apocalyptic and that sounds a lot like science fiction to me and other seemed to think so as well. However, many critics claimed that there was a lack of other science fiction elements. They also argued that the writing style belonged to literary fiction. Everyone is right. The Road is literary science fiction and I think it’s an absolutely great piece of writing. Obviously, I’m not the only one.

The simple truth is that genre fiction and literary fiction aren’t going anywhere. Creating animosity, holding onto animosity, and poking each other with sticks won’t actually accomplish anything. If someone keeps a talented writer out of their classroom, they’ve only succeeded in telling me that they like to put personal preference above creative productivity. Let’s not do that. Instead, let’s write, write well, and give each other a pat on the back when we accomplish that goal.

STORY SUNDAY: 2013 READING LIST

January 27th, 2013

Hey, everyone! It’s Story Sunday! In the future, this is where I’ll discuss a story or some element of a story. Today, I want to talk about my reading list for 2013. I’ve spent the last few years reading primarily for school. Classes kept me so busy that I didn’t have much time to read outside of what was required. Part of being in an MFA program is writing as much as you can, as well as you can. I, along with others, think the other half of the equation is reading as much as you can.

I know I’m a little late when it comes to making 2013 goals. Residency started right after the the holidays and I’ve been sick ever since. So, while I’m about a month late, I feel 2013 is just beginning.

So here’s my reading list for 2013. It includes a couple of books I need to re-read but not many. This doesn’t include books assigned for my “Readings in the Genre” class. I would like to complete this list in addition to the RIG books assigned.

  1. The Dark Corner – Mark Powell
  2. Mistborn: The Final Empire– Brandon Sanderson
  3. Mistborn: The Well of Ascension– Brandon Sanderson 
  4. Mistborn: The Hero of Ages– Brandon Sanderson 
  5. The Allow of Law: A Mistborn Novel– Brandon Sanderson 
  6. The Lies of Locke Lamora (The Gentleman Bastard Sequence) – Scott Lynch
  7. Red Seas Under Red Skies (The Gentleman Bastard Sequence) – Scott Lynch
  8. A Feast for Crows: A Song of Ice and Fire – George R.R. Martin
  9. A Dance with Dragons: A Song of Ice and Fire – George R.R. Martin
  10. The Name of the Wind – Patrick Rothfuss
  11. The Wise Man’s Fear – Patrick Rothfuss
  12. The Blade Itself: The First Law– Joe Abercombie 
  13. Before they are Hanged: The First Law– Joe Abercombie
  14. Last Argument of Kings: The First Law– Joe Abercombie 
  15. Shogun – James Clavell
  16. The Road – Cormac McCarthy
  17. Blood Song (A Raven’s Shadow Novel) – Anthony Ryan
  18. The Last Unicorn – Peter S. Beagle
  19. The Minotaur Takes a Cigarette Break – Steven Sherrill
  20. The Time Traveler’s Wife – Audrey Niffenegger
  21. Furies of Calderon (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher 
  22. Academ’s Fury (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher
  23. Cursor’s Fury (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher
  24. Captain’s Fury (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher 
  25. Princep’s Fury (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher 
  26. First Lord’s Fury (Codex Alera) – Jim Butcher 
  27. Lord Foul’s Bane: The First Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  28. The Illearth War: The First Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  29. The Power That Preserves: The First Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  30. The Wounded Land: The Second Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  31. The One Tree: The Second Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  32. White Gold Wielder: The Second Chonicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  33. The Runes of the Earth: The Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  34. Fatal Revenant: The Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  35. Against All Things Ending: The Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  36. The Last Dark: The Last Chronicles of Thomas Covenant – Stephen  R. Donaldson
  37. Gardens of the Moon (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson
  38. Deadhouse Gates (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson 
  39. Memories of Ice (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson 
  40. House of Chains (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson
  41. Midnight Tides (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson
  42. The Bonehunters (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson 
  43. Reaper’s Gale (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson
  44. Toll the Hounds (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson
  45. Dust of Dreams (Malazan Book of the Fallen) – Steven Erickson 
  46. The Crippled God (Malazan Book of the Fallen) –Steven Erickson
  47. The Eye of the World (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  48. The Great Hunt (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  49. The Dragon Reborn (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  50. The Shadow Rising (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  51. The Fires of Heaven (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  52. Lord of Chaos (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  53. A Crown of Swords (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  54. The Path of Daggers (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  55. Winter’s Heart (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  56. Crossroads of Twilight (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  57. Knife of Dreams (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan
  58. The Gathering Storm (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan/Brandon Sanderson
  59. Towers of Midnight (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan/Brandon Sanderson
  60. A Memory of Light (The Wheel of Time) – Robert Jordan/Brandon Sanderson

I’m not a particularly fast reader. I have the ability to read quickly but I feel like I don’t get as much out of the novel. I also feel like I don’t remember the novel as well as years go by. So I prefer to take a slower pace. This year will definitely be a challenge for me but I’m looking forward to every book on the list. Over the years, I’ve put off reading quite a few novels because of scheduling conflicts. I’m fortunate to be in a program that encourages this kind of reading.

Now it’s your turn. What books do you plan on reading in 2013? Do you have a set list? Any suggestions for 2014’s reading list?

FAN FRIDAY: DORALEOUS AND ASSOCIATES

January 25th, 2013

It’s Fan Friday, everyone! I’m excited to talk about a hilarious show called Doraleous and Associates and you can find their first episode here. Recently, I took part in the MFA residency at Seton Hill University. A lot of different topics come up during residency. One of the great things about hanging out with other genre writers is that you find out about all kinds of cool stuff. If you love fantasy and you’re put in a room with thirty other fantasy writers, someone there probably knows about something you would love but haven’t encountered yet. It’s a great time to share all kinds of interests.

This time, I talked about Doraleous and Associates with several people. In a nutshell, the show is a comical look at epic/adventure fantasy. The concepts are great. Doraleous has formed a small band of adventurers including a human wizard, an elven archer (with a southern accent), a human barbarian, a dwarf warrior (with a high pitched voice), a knight named Sir Walken, and Doraleous himself, a classic human swordsman. From there, they encounter scenarios that have been seen in many fantasy stories but with a comical twist. Their first episode includes an appearance from “The Lady of the Lake,” where Doraleous finds out he’s the chosen one and hilarity ensues.

What really makes this show great is the characters. They’re funny, unique, and bring comedy to every situation. Without their witty banter, the funny scenarios would be funny but definitely not as memorable. To shed a little light on one of their characters, I’ll just mention the elf Neebs. He’s an instigator, he’s funny, and he does it all with a southern accent and a smile. In fact, his accent is one of his best features. The writers took the existing idea of an elf and twisted it. Instead of the classic elves you see in fantasy, the ones that live in nature with impeccable clothing and perfect speech, Doraleous and Associates took a different take with ragged clothes and southern accents. Elves are truly the hard-working woodsmen of fantasy.

Some of you may have heard of this show already. In fact, it’s been around for quite some time. I’ve chosen it this week for two reasons. One, I managed to completely rekindle my love for this show by talking about it with other people. I’m working my way through the episodes once again and find them to be just as hilarious as before. Two, it’s coming back. The makers of the show were on hiatus for quite a while. They became involved in other projects and could no longer keep up with Doraleous and Associates. However, they never forgot about their fans and continuously assured everyone that the show would return. You can find out more about this on their Facebook page. So look forward to more Doraleous and Associates in 2013!

Now it’s your turn. What are you a fan of this week? Are there other amazing web shows out there that the world should know about?

WRITING WEDNESDAY: HOW WE INTRODUCE PEOPLE/CHARACTERS

January 23rd, 2013

Hey, everyone, it’s Writing Wednesday! Today, I’m actually responding to a great blog post by R² Writes that really made me think.

Check out her blog, it’s great. For the purpose of this post, I’ll go ahead and provide my own example.

When we describe someone, real or fictional, we bring them into the room before they’ve actually arrived. In doing this, we establish a set of expectations with our audience. Let me give you an example from my own life.

I have this friend, let’s call him Galad. Well, Galad has a crazy sense of humor. I’ve described him as crazy, hilarious, outrageous, and generally insane with a knack for humor. So, here’s a little story to accompany my claim. One night, my friends (including Galad) and I were joking around and drinking at a mutual friend’s house. Well, mutual friend’s fiance says, “I’m going to invite over some of my girlfriends. Is that okay?” Now, I don’t think anyone was going to object but Galad took things a step further. He slowly nodded his head, jumped from his seat, and scream “yeah.” Then he proceeded to rip the front of his t-shirt like a wrestler rallying the crowd. Oh, I should probably add “impulsive” to my description of Galad, because it was a decent shirt.

So, if I said that I wanted to introduce you to Galad, I think you would have some firm expectations. Okay, fast forward about four months. A Christmas party is taking place at the same mutual friend’s house. This time, it’s more of an office party for mutual friend’s fiance. Well, one of her co-workers, we’ll call him Billy Joe Strokes, happens to be a good friend of mine. Now, over the years, I’ve supplied Billy Joe Strokes with a lot of these outrageous stories/descriptions. When I told him that Galad was coming, his face lit up. He would finally meet the legend from so many outrageous tales. On top of that, he would probably witness one himself. Unfortunately, Billy Joe Strokes was destined to be disappointed. We were all attending a Christmas party. Furthermore, it was an office party with people Galad doesn’t really know. To put it simply, Galad wasn’t in his natural habitat. Oh, and drinking would probably be casual at most.

After the party, Billy Joe Strokes looked at me and said, “that was the guy?” Yeah, it was him. It was the real him. Every time I see Galad, he’s not swinging from a chandelier or ripping open his shirt. The man would have a clothing bill a mile long. In that moment, I realized that I hadn’t really done Galad justice with my descriptions. When he’s not being the life of the party, he’s pretty quiet. Galad is intelligent and he’s incredibly observant. I’ve had a lot of great conversations with this guy about serious topics. However, when I describe him to another friend, I highlight his outrageous characteristics.  In turn, Billy Joe Strokes was destined to be disappointed.

What does this have to do with writing? Everything. If your characters are heavily intertwined, they probably talk about one another. If they don’t talk about one another, main characters may reference minor characters that show up periodically. A great example of this is Gregor Clegane in George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire. If you’ve read the series, you know that he’s referenced to as “the mountain that rides.” It’s quite a nickname and it sets up the reader’s expectations. When Gregor enters a scene, his stature and reputation bring a certain weight and tone to the situation. A situation will seem more dangerous if Gregor is on the opposing side. The reason it works in Martin’s series is because he backs up these reader expectations with events. If characters throughout the novels referred to Gregor as the strongest man alive, a terror, and a mountain, only to have him die in the first fight the reader sees, the characters don’t seem credible. Instead, Gregor is given victories in war. The reader sees Gregor’s strength at a tournament. Other characters may reference Gregor and keep his reputation alive, but the reader has seen that the reputation is deserved. Now, in the case of Billy Joe Strokes, it didn’t matter that Galad didn’t live up to the expectations I established. He’ll meet Galad again, or maybe he won’t, but the situation won’t make of break our relationship. In a novel, however, a situation like that could break the reader’s expectations and their willingness to keep reading.

Have you ever read a synopsis of a character? Or maybe had a friend describe a character from a novel to you? Were you ever disappointed when you actually opened the book and turned the pages? When writing a short description of a book, sometimes a publisher will choose to highlight amazing qualities of the protagonist. However, if protagonist is fully fleshed out, there’s probably a lot more to them. That’s a good thing, it’s a great thing, except for the part where you’ve been handed a set of expectations that might not line up with the character right away. In a story, audience expectations are everything and you rarely want to set up expectations your reader won’t actually experience.

MATT CASTS REVIVE ON HIS BLOG!

January 22nd, 2013

So, if you started following this blog last year, then you might be wondering what happened to it. Unfortunately, over-scheduling happened. Once SHU’s MFA program got into full swing, my schedule filled up really fast. I had to prioritize my work and this little blog fell right through the cracks. This year, I’m going to work on my scheduling and time management. I have a lot of goals, I’m no longer new to the program, and I’m hoping to accomplish quite a bit.

In celebration of the new year, new semester, and new direction of the blog, I’ve decided to change the format. As you can see, this format has more of a typewriter feel. I also think it has a slight newspaper feel to it. Anyway, I love this new format. I know that some bloggers like a lot of flash on their pages, they love a lot of images and fancy things. I love those things too but in the interest of time, I can’t keep up with it. Instead, I’ve chosen this very clean format that should make the site easy to navigate and enjoyable to look at. I like the way it looks on a computer and I love the way it looks on a tablet.

I’ve also created three new categories that I’ll try to write about once a week. We have Writing Wednesday, Fan Friday, and Story Sunday.

Writing Wednesday: This will be a place to talk about writing, reading, or concepts within a genre. I might give writing advice, talk about an issue I’m having in my own writing, or address certain things I see in writing today.

Fan Friday: Honestly, I’m just going to dedicate a post to being a fan of something. I like a lot of things from books, to shows, to products, and so on. On Fridays, come by and tell me what you’re interested in this week. Everyone has likes and interests and this is a place for you to share them.

Story Sunday: Let’s talk about stories! This is a place there I might do some reviews or just talk about different stories I’ve encountered. This isn’t limited to novels, feel free to talk about stories in any form or genre.

Once in a while, I might introduce a theme for a certain week. Off the top of my head, I can tell you that I’ll probably have a week for George R.R. Martin. I’ll talk about his writing, fan out about once of his books, and then talk about one of his story arcs.

This is a blog, it’s a place for me to post ideas but it’s also a place for you to come and express your own ideas.  So join in and have some fun!